Tag Archives: Jennifer K. Hale

What’s In A Name?

For most writers, naming a character is like naming one’s own child.  

Names are important.  They are carefully considered for their meaning, spelling, and personal preference, as well as the general “feeling” they will give to the reader, especially for main characters.  A well written story can make a character name as famous as any person.  For example, if someone (usually a tween-aged girl) walks around wearing a shirt with the words “Team Edward” scrawled across it, most people don’t have to ask who Edward is.

A good name is recognizable to all, even if you’ve never read the book.

Scarlett O’Hara.  Mr. Darcy.  Harry Potter.  Heathcliff.  Sherlock Holmes.  Holden Caufield.  Atticus Finch.  Jacob Black.  Eliza Doolittle.

But have you ever read a story where the name did not fit the character?  Or perhaps something about the name took you out of the story a bit?

This happened to me with the first episode of my favorite TV show, The Vampire Diaries.  When introduced to the Salvatore brothers, I was a little disappointed with the names.  Stefan is not my idea of a very ‘masculine’ name, but that aside, the history nerd in me took over as their backstory unfolded.  Plantation owners in Virginia of Italian decent?  The odds of that are next to nil.  Every time it’s mentioned on the show, it really, really bothers me.  On the other hand, Katerina Petrova is a perfect name for Katherine’s backstory.
**Disclaimer- I have not read any of the books in this series because I love the show so much.  I don’t want to know what’s going to happen.

Another instance when this happened to me was when I began reading the most famous book series in the world- Harry Potter.  When first introduced to the characters, the one name that stuck out to me immediately was Ron Weasley. 

I expected the Weasley family to be sneaky, scavenging, underhanded weasel-like people, of course. But they are completely the opposite of that, providing Harry with the only stable family he’s ever known, which threw me a bit.  Of course I eventually got used to it, but I still don’t like the name choice.  It would have been better for Pettigrew to have been Ron’s last name (and his family) and let Peter Weasley be the one to eventually betray Harry’s parents. 

But that would have been obvious.  And that leads me to my next point.

I don’t like obvious names.

When I’m reading a story and the character’s names actually do fit their personality, it makes me roll my eyes.  For example, I was reading a novel not too long ago where the hero’s last name was Knight.

Knight, White, Truly, Love, Mary, Shepherd, initials J.C., Gabriel– examples of names that elude to the character being squeaky-clean and heroic.

It goes the other way, too.  Naming a character Cain or Lucifer when he’s a bad guy is kinda overkill.

Much of this boils down to personal preference.  For example, I don’t love any of the names of the main characters in the Twilight Saga.  (I’m now dodging the rocks, pencils, computer mice, and other objects that some of you are launching toward me.)

I love love love the last name Cullen.  Great choice, Steph.  Oh, and the fact that Hale is also a surname in the book makes me happy.  But again, I had issue with other name choices.  Edward?  I know she was trying to be period correct to the turn of the century, but it’s not my favorite.  Jacob?  Yep, this one is okay.  Bella?  Bella means beautiful.  The beauty of the name made me long for a character of grace and charm…and we all know that one of Bella’s main issues is that she’s a giant klutz.  But, hey, this is my preference against the author’s.  And as for the rest of the Cullen family, the only name I actually really liked because it “fit” the character was Alice.

But did my so-so feelings about the names in the story dissuade me from reading (more like devouring) the books?  Not at all.  The story hooked me so well that the names no longer mattered to me.  Eddie and Jake made their way into my heart the same as millions of other readers.

One name that sticks with me is another from J.K. Rowling- Mathilda Hopkirk.  I just like the way it rolls off the tongue.

When I’m naming my characters I start with names I like.  Sometimes I research the background of the name–this is how I discovered that Molly and Mary both mean “bitter.”  I definitely consider the spelling of the name.  It has to be easy for the reader to pronounce (right, J.K. Rowling?) and I think the spelling lends itself to character traits.

For example, if a character’s name is Ashleigh, a reader might find the young woman to be more delicate or soft than if her name is Ashli or Ashlee.  Or if his name is Max, his ethnicity can change if it becomes Maks.

As a teacher, I’ve had lists and lists of student names to use as reference for naming characters.  In my mind, some of the names are synonymous with negative behavior, while others bring to mind the cute, cheerleader type, and yet others the studious scholar.  These frames of reference help quite a lot in choosing names for characters.

A character’s name in a story, just like with people we know in real life, needs to be remembered.

Tips for naming:

It’s important to make the name unique and somewhat catchy, all while maintaining the essence of the character’s personality and making sure to be true to the story.  For example, a wealthy aristocrat businessman from New York City should not be named Bubba or Skeeter, as an intelligent nuclear physicist probably shouldn’t be named Fifi or Duffy.

Keep it consistent.  Don’t have too many nicknames for your characters throughout the story.  Have your characters refer to each other consistently so that the reader is not confused.

When in doubt, keep it simple.

Even if your novel is rather fantastical, when all of your names are creative and unique, readers can find it difficult to remember and differentiate between them all.  (Harry Potter is a good example again here- some of the names in the novels are creative & wild, others are normal and somewhat plain.)

Don’t give several characters in your book the same name.  It works to have Kelly A., Kelly B., and Kelly C. in a kindergarten class, but not in a novel.

Also, if the name is too off the wall, not historically appropriate, or just plain doesn’t make sense (Abcde will not be a name featured in any of my novels), it takes the reader right out of the story and doesn’t allow them to connect with your character.  So don’t look for any of the characters in my novel that deals with Islam to be named Bob.

Speaking of, how would you have liked for Bella to fall in love with Bob Cullen?

Share with me:
What are some of your favorite names, both from books you’ve read and people you’ve known?

5 Comments

Filed under Writing

Winning The War of Worship

My pastor recently preached a sermon on worship.  He said that the scriptures state that we are all to open our mouths and sing to the Lord.

As he spoke the words, I could feel the tension in the sanctuary beginning to thicken.  Suddenly, attention had been called once again to the battle that our church, and many churches throughout the world, have been fighting for years now.

How to worship.

There are two camps: those who believe that the traditional way is best, and those who believe that a more contemporary way is best.  And a lot of times the battle boils down to a will of generations– those who prefer the tried and true way, and those who want change.

The arguments of both sides are valid.  The traditional camp believes that the hymns and songs of the faith that have been sung for years (in the cases of some hymns, literally hundreds of years) present the most reverent offer of worship to the Lord and connect the founders of the faith with the followers of today.

The contemporary camp believes that in order to draw in the lost and entertain worshipers, the songs should be new, raw, and most of the time accompanied with a band that consists of at least a guitar, keyboard, and drums.

But the real issue here is not traditional v. contemporary.  The real issue is about the intentions in the hearts of the worshipers. 

Worship isn’t about the how, but about the who.

Who is being glorified by the worship?  Is it the organist?  Is it the band?  Is it the singers in the choir loft, on the stage, or in the pews?  The correct answer is that only One should be glorified in our worship.

Reading carefully through the Psalms, it’s easy to see how David and the other authors glorified God with their voices and their instruments, not concerned about the comfort level of their fellow man; only concerned that God’s ears would be pleased with the sounds of his devoted faithful.

The scriptures say that if we do not praise Him, the rocks will.  Verse 12 of Psalm 96 says that the trees will praise his name.  We can be certain that the rocks, seas, mountains, hills and trees don’t care about what instruments are being used or whether the tempo of the song is too fast or too slow.

When we begin to fuss and argue over style of worship we are forgetting the true meaning of the word.    

When we are indwelled with the Holy Spirit, worship is a time for us to pour our hearts out to God in gratitude for his mercies and grace through the sacrifice of His son.

“Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.” John 4:23-24

When we think about just how amazing God’s mercy is and how it has changed our lives and adjust the attitude of our hearts, the worship will pour out.  No matter the format, arms raised or folded, tempo fast or slow, words in a hymnal or on a screen, God will be glorified.

And that’s all that matters.

Personally, I find amazing worship in all types of music within the church tradition.  There is no song more beautiful to my mind than How Great Thou Art.  And when I imagine what it will be like to sit at the throne of God and sing of His wondrous love, no song is more powerful to me than You Are Holy (Isaiah 6).

Share with me: What’s your favorite worship song or hymn and why?

7 Comments

Filed under The Christian Walk

The First Time I Fell in Love

I was listening to the Adult Contemporary station on the Sirius XM radio this morning and the song “All For Love” by Bryan Adams, Sting, and Rod Stewart came on.  Immediately I was transported back to 1993 and the first time I fell in love.

And when I say I fell in love, I mean it.  I fell hard.  I went to see the movie “The Three Musketeers.”  You remember it.  It starred a pre-psychotic break Charlie Sheen, pre-superhuman government agent Kiefer Sutherland, a not-so-much smaller than he is now Oliver Platt, and the first man I ever loved, Chris O’Donnell.  *Dreamy Sigh*

In all of my 13 years, I had never seen a man so wonderful, handsome, charming, and utterly amazing as Chris O’Donnell was to me the first time I saw the film.  Oh, I’d had several TV crushes before, but nothing compared to the heart-fluttering, knee weakening, butterflied stomach feeling he gave me.  I saw the movie in the theater 4 times.  I cut his pictures out of those teen magazines and taped them to my closet door.  And according to my mother, I wrote him a letter.  (I don’t remember that though- I think my adult self has chosen to block that out.  The rest of it is enough humiliation.)  And “All For Love” became “our” song. I bought the movie as soon as it was released (yes, I still have the VHS I purchased).  I remember staring at those pictures of him thinking that if he could just meet me, he’d be so amazed at how awesome I was.  I didn’t factor in my crazy-stalker behavior or the fact that he was in his 20s.  None of that mattered.  All that mattered was that I was hopelessly in love.  Don’t ask me to explain it.  It defies explanation.

As the years passed I found many more celebrities to crush on, but I’ll always think fondly of Chris.  Believe it or not, I don’t even watch NCIS (is that the show he’s on now?), nor do I purposefully see a movie because he’s in it.  But I’ll always remember that he was my first love.

I think that’s what I find so fun about writing romantic fiction.  With each story I get to recall those feelings of excitement that come with new love.  I get to feel those butterflies, experience the weak knees, and sigh over the pure cheesy romance of it when the spark happens between my characters.

There’s nothing as wonderful as being in a committed, loving relationship (y’all know I’m very happily married), but there’s a little rush of joy that comes with writing about people falling in love for the first time.  And if I need inspiration, I’ll listen to “All for Love” and think of my favorite D’Artagnan. 

Who was your first love?

7 Comments

Filed under Romance